Language learner.

To converted Christians who criticize the marriage of Prophet Muhammad and Aisha, may Allah be pleased with her

Some Christians criticize the marriage of Prophet Muhammad to Aisha and call it “child marriage.”

But before making that accusation, you should ask yourself first: she was about six when you married her.. and first one was about 7 and present one is about 8 half.

Are they judging history fairly, or are they applying modern standards only against Islam?

Sahih al-Bukhari records that Prophet Muhammad contracted marriage with Aisha when she was six and began living with her when she was nine. Muslims do not hide this narration.

However, the important point is this:

Seventh-century Arabia cannot be judged only by twenty-first-century standards.

At that time, marriage was not measured by the modern legal age of “18.” It was judged according to physical maturity, guardian approval, social custom, and the ability to enter married life.

Now let us apply the same standard to Christian history.

Traditional Catholic canon law long recognized 12 for females and 14 for males as the minimum age for marriage.

Christian history also contains many examples:

• Saint Augustine wrote in Confessions that when he was around 30, he was engaged to a girl who was two years below the legal Roman age for marriage. Since the Roman legal age for females was 12, she was about 10.

• King Richard II of England married Isabella of Valois when he was 29. She was about 6.

• Margaret Beaufort, mother of Henry VII, married at 12 and gave birth to Henry VII at 13.

• Margaret of Austria was betrothed at 3 to the French dauphin Charles, later Charles VIII, and sent to the French court.

• Anne de Mowbray married Richard of Shrewsbury at 5.

• Princess Mary, later Princess of Orange, married William II when she was 9.

• Catherine of Aragon married Prince Arthur at 15 and later married Henry VIII.

• Margaret Tudor married King James IV of Scotland when she was 13 and he was 29.

• Judith of Flanders married King Æthelwulf of Wessex when she was about 12.

• Eleanor of England married King Alfonso VIII of Castile when she was about 9.

Of course, some of these were political marriages, and in some cases married life began later.

But that is exactly the point.

Marriage in the past was based on standards different from those of modern society. This was not unique to Islam. It was also found in the Christian world.

So if a Christian condemns only the marriage of Prophet Muhammad by using modern standards, while ignoring Christian canon law and the history of Christian royal marriages, that is not objective historical judgment.

It is a double standard.

Muslims are not saying, “Let us practice underage marriage today.”

Muslims today must obey the laws of the countries in which they live, and marriage must take place within the legal and social order of each society.

Our point is simple:

When judging historical figures, we must consider the law, society, culture, and customs of their own time.

If seventh-century Arabia is judged by modern standards, then the same standard must also be applied to Christian history, canon law, and the many royal marriages of the Christian world.

Otherwise, this is not a sincere search for truth.

It is selective criticism used only to attack Islam.

Is there anyone who is working under the organization of Life foundation?
If yes, please in-box us....

Involved in both trafficking and missionary activities..

It has been reported that a converted Christian who arrived into Bangladesh Refugee camp in 2021 from India New Delhi with the aim of missionary he came here. Another converted Christian who brought him from India. After the arrival here into Bangladesh Refugee camp . married a Muslim girl who is under the age of 16 . Which is involved in Child marriage but the authorities has taken no action. who is an agent but the authorities has not investigate, it also been reported that a Rohingya converted Christian who influenced and manipulate to various Rohingya students to go in several Camps to go to India under him for study. Which is called human trafficking but being involved there on such activities but the responsible people has taken no action.
There are five individuals who are working on this process, from Camp 13 , from Kutupalong Camp whose one eye is blind. Others three are from India who receive there. and are the senders and , and are the receivers..

It's been reported that 7/6/2026 who is a converted pastor fled into India again with a girl who is under 13 . According to our reservation there is involved and it also said that these two individuals fully supported him on the process. We the Rohingya community people are requesting the to take action against he is not only involved in trafficking but also involved in elligal missionary activities and others criminals activities...

According to the report and are both the responsible for the issues. The Bangladeshi authorities must investigate the matter properly and their activities in Camp..

Copied......

“I used to say Islam is a lie. Islam is a danger. I decided to write an anti-islam book which started as anti-islam book changed into this search for God and it ended up me becoming a Muslim.”
Former Dutch Politician Joram Van Klaveren.




Why Rohingya are converting into Christianity?