Vacation Canada

Today i was in front of a judge. Justice your story. Justice Canada CUBA Development Justice Homelessness Path To Recovery TORONTO COURT I ENCOUNTERED 2 NICE AFRICAN CANADIAN DOUG FORD EMPLOYEES. I HAVE RUN IN 6 ELECTION IN ONTARIO. I'M VERY WELL KNOWN . YET I COULDN'T TALK THESE 2 NON JUDGES TO HAVE 5 MINUTES. TO SPEAK WITH THE Judge i came to see. My goal was to report a CRIME in progress. When a lawyer does a crime our Law Society is who deals with these issues. When I'm unable to report a crime to the proper authorities. What does the Doug Ford government what me to do ?
32.08sr Motion for summary judgment BRUCE DAVID TATE VS DAVE & SHIELA SPARKS ON MAY 16TH 2026 I AM BRINGING A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT.
As Owner and president of Master Cartage Inc I bring this motion to get my company ASSETS & funds released held in court against this couples unlawfully actions. Briefly explain the history to your MASTER CARTAGE INC 1983 to March 2000. BRUCE DAVID TATE Control of Master Cartage Inc was left with my Brother in law and my father DAVID BRUCE TATE. Amedently the 30 power units and 100 trailers was transferred to Master Trucking Inc. Customers 2.5 million yearly. My Father died October 16 2004 he said the company was busy purchasing 2 new tractors from Ford. 10 used trailer from Leslie Trailer! Early in 2003 Master Trucking Inc The Sparks declared Bankruptcy! FOR MY FATHER? or a company in his name. Master Trucking Inc has never made any government payments, no taxes even propery taxes were paid. THE Sparks TURNING their attention to the 3 properties. Created fraudulent Mortgages 1554352 was the mortgage holder and 155409 being the Sparks. SPARKS CLAIM IT WAS TO PROTECT MASTER CARTAGE INC ASSETS. Sparks Lawyer wrote " there a series of Fraudulent transactions " ) Officer in Charge: Inspector Peter Callaghan now Detective Michael Streng. 1.2 million directly into Dave & Sheila Sparks. 800,000,00 unexplained. Zero payed to any Government obligations until Authorities closed Master Trucking Inc. ORDERS IN DEFAULT. JUDGE WHITAKER RULED THE LAST WILL VALID SHEILA SPARKS . DID NOT APPEAL THE RULING. 2012. 2015 MOTION TO RECOVER MONEY TURNED OVER ON A WITHOUT PREJUDICE BASIS TO MY OWNERSHIP WAS ADDRESSED. #9. VARIED ALL 5 SISTERS WERE TO PAY 5/6 OF ALL COMPENDIUM MATTERS ORDER IN 15 DAYS. NONE ON THEM APPEALED THIS ORDER. 2.5 MILLION LISTED IN MY MOTION MATERIAL. SHOWS ALL THE ITEMS. DURING 2007 TO 2009 MY PLEADINGS were Unlawfully struck. Doing all this without a lawyer was extremely hard. My Company that made 2.5 million after i dismissed my older Sister Husband for embezzling 10,000 in feul to 4 broker trucks in Buckley Transportation. I AM ASKING THE JUDGE HEARING MY MOTION TO DISMISS THE FRAUDULENT MORTGAGES & RETURN EVERYTHING TO MASTER CARTAGE INC MASTER CARTAGE INC. 100 PERCENT SPARKS RETURN EVERYTHING. (POLICE ASSISTANT IF REQUIRED) Order 1. Release 1.4 million dollars held in court . 2. RETURN EVERYTHING thats Master Cartage Inc money misappropriated from Master trucking Inc. ,assets, customers affiliated Trucking companies ie. SPARKS TRANSPORTATION . FULL AUTHORITY TO GET POLICE INVESTIGATION ASSISTANT. 3. DISMISSAL OF 1554352 VS 1554509 . AS BOTH ARE MASTER CARTAGE INC. 4. A ORDER TO I MAY BRING A MOTION ON 04-CV-276610 , AS 15.01-2 AS ORDERED BEFORE JUDGE DUNPHY REMOVED ME, NO EVIDENCE FROM ME WAS SEEN OR HEARD. PERMISSION TO BRING A MOTION TO SETASIDE OR VARIED. ALSO SEPTEMBER 17 2025 SETASIDE. TRANSCRIPTS IN FILE. JUDGE EDWARD TAMARA HAD MISSLEADING INFORMATION, I WAS ON THE BELIEF WE WERE TO DEAL WITH MY URGENT MOTION ORDERED BY JUDGE CALLAGHAN MARCH 2025.
5. A MONTHLY PAYMENT TO RECOVER ORDER OF JUDGE SHORT 2015 .
WHAT EVER THE COURT DEEMS FAIR. PLAINTIFF
BRUCE DAVID TATE
508-40 CONWAY DR LONDON ONTARIO
226-503-7835 N6E2Y9 Defendants
DAVE & SHIELA SPARKS
[email protected]
59 Allen Ave Toronto Ontario
SPARKSTRANSPORTATION

Lawyers withholding evidence and covering up a crime is a serious violation of legal ethics and criminal law, often characterized as obstruction of justice, tampering with evidence, or perverting the course of justice.
Department of Justice Canada
Department of Justice Canada
+2
Here is a breakdown of the implications, consequences, and legal distinctions based on the role of the lawyer and the jurisdiction:
1. Consequences for Prosecutors (Crown Attorneys)
Prosecutors have a duty to "do justice," not just win cases. Withholding exculpating evidence (evidence that points to innocence) is a major violation.
Civil Liability: Prosecutors can be sued if they intentionally withhold evidence, as established in cases like Henry v. British Columbia (Attorney General) in Canada.
Professional Misconduct: Intentional concealment can lead to a citation from the Law Society, resulting in suspension or disbarment.
Criminal Charges: While they are generally immune for negligent conduct, prosecutors can face criminal charges for obstruction of justice if they engage in intentional misconduct.
dklegalpractice.ca
dklegalpractice.ca
+3
2. Consequences for Defense Lawyers
While defense lawyers have a duty to protect their clients, they cannot actively participate in covering up a crime.
Physical Evidence: A lawyer must not conceal, destroy, or alter incriminating physical evidence. If a lawyer takes possession of such evidence, they are generally required to turn it over to authorities.
Breach of Ethics: Knowingly hiding evidence or misleading the court is professional misconduct, leading to disbarment.
Exceptions: A lawyer can properly advise a client that they have the right to remain silent and do not have to divulge the location of physical evidence. However, they cannot act or advise anyone to hide it.
Law Society of BC
Law Society of BC
+1
3. Key Legal Principles
Stinchcombe Rule (Canada): Prosecutors are required to disclose all relevant evidence to the defense, with exceptions for privileged information.
Solicitor-Client Privilege: While this protects conversations between a lawyer and client, it does not protect the planning of future crimes or the concealment of ongoing ones.
Abuse of Process: If a lawyer's actions violate a fundamental sense of justice, a court may stay (stop) the proceedings.
Law Society of BC
Law Society of BC
+4
4. Legal Definitions of Misconduct
Tampering with Evidence: Altering, concealing, or destroying evidence to interfere with an investigation.
Obstructing Justice: Willfully attempting to defeat the course of justice, such as by threatening witnesses or fabricating evidence.
Fabricating Evidence: Creating false evidence (e.g., fraudulent documents) with intent to use it in a judicial proceeding.
Department of Justice Canada
Department of Justice Canada
+2
If evidence of a crime was hidden, it is often necessary to report this to the overseeing law society (e.g., Law Society of Ontario, State Bar Association) and to police to initiate a criminal investigation into the lawyers involved

Concern also.
21 years will challenge in Toronto courts.
Unfortunately, there's no direct data on the number of wills challenged in Canada or the US. However, we do know that around 50% of Canadians don't have a will, while in the US, about 56% of adults lack any estate planning documents, including a will. In the US, only 26% of adults have a will, down from 31% in 2025. Without specific challenge statistics, it's hard to give a precise answer, but estate planning gaps are a growing concern in both countries.
There's no evidence of a controversy over a 30 million dollar jet for Doug Ford, but there is a big controversy over his plan to bring jets to Billy Bishop Airport in Toronto. Doug Ford wants to expropriate Toronto's share of the airport and declare it a special economic zone to speed up his plan for jets, despite concerns about noise pollution and environmental impacts. He's determined to make it happen one way or another.