Dadpfh Sayap Hiv-Aids Treatment Hub

Why Vaccination Matters for PLHIV?…….

PLHIV have weakened immune systems, particularly those with low CD4 counts or those not yet initiated on ART. This makes them more susceptible to infections such as influenza, pneumonia, hepatitis, and other vaccine-preventable diseases.

Vaccination provides the following benefits:

* Prevention of Opportunistic Infections: Vaccines help protect against diseases that can become severe or life-threatening in immunocompromised individuals.
* Reduction of Hospitalization and Healthcare Costs: Preventing infections reduces the need for hospital admissions and long-term treatment.
* Improved Quality of Life: Staying healthy allows PLHIV to maintain productivity and social functioning.
* Public Health Protection: Immunization reduces disease transmission within communities.

The Department of Health (DOH) recommends that PLHIV receive appropriate vaccines such as influenza, pneumococcal, hepatitis B, and COVID-19 vaccines, depending on clinical assessment.

For the entry of DADPFH SAYAP HIV AIDS TREATMENT HUB Best Practice entitled “PROJECT ROSE”

R – Responsive and Rights-Based Care

O – Organized Continuum of Services

S – Strategic Support and Surveillance

E – Education, Empowerment, and Elimination of Stigma

Salamat po sa Ina ng probinsiya ng North Cotabato sa walang humpay na supporta at pagbibigay sa amin ng lakas upang makamit ang tagumpay sa programmang pangkalahatan SA SUPPORTA AT BUHAY! Maraming salamat po…..

Empowering the youth through knowledge and awareness! ❤️ An Event headed by Municipal Health and DEPED Aleosan, together with Provincial Government of North Cotabato IPHO - DADPFH SAYAP TREATMENT FACILITY.

Earlier today, a successful HIV & AIDS Prevention Symposium was conducted at Tomado High School, Aleosan, North Cotabato, with the active participation of Grade 6, Grade 7, and Grade 8 students. The activity aimed to educate young learners about HIV prevention, promote responsible decision-making, and reduce stigma and discrimination toward people living with HIV.

Through informative discussions, open conversations, and community engagement, students gained a better understanding of how HIV is transmitted, how it can be prevented, and the importance of compassion and respect for everyone.

This initiative reflects our continuous commitment to building an informed and responsible generation that values health, awareness, and empathy.

Together, let us continue to spread knowledge, break the stigma, and protect our communities. 💙

Points to Ponder

The (SC) has ruled that same-sex couples who live together may be recognized as co-owners of property under Article 148 of the 𝘍𝘢𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘺 𝘊𝘰𝘥𝘦, provided there is proof of actual contribution.

In a Decision written by Associate Justice Jhosep Y. Lopez, the SC’s Second Division granted a woman’s complaint for partition of property and recognized her as a co-owner of the house and lot she shared with her same-sex partner.

Article 148 of the 𝘍𝘢𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘺 𝘊𝘰𝘥𝘦 governs the property relations of couples who are living together but cannot legally marry, acknowledging co-ownership based on their actual contributions.

The two women lived together as a couple. A year into their relationship, they purchased a house and lot, and agreed to register the property in one partner’s name to facilitate banking transactions.

Upon separation, they agreed to sell the property and divide the proceeds equally. One partner signed an 𝘈𝘤𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸𝘭𝘦𝘥𝘨𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 stating that the other had paid about 50% of the purchase and renovation costs.

However, she later refused to sell the property and denied that her former partner was a co-owner.

To protect her interest, the former partner annotated an adverse claim on the title and demanded partition of the property. When this failed, she filed a case for partition of real estate and damages, relying on the 𝘈𝘤𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸𝘭𝘦𝘥𝘨𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 as proof of co-ownership.

The SC granted the complaint for partition of real estate, as it clarified the provisions in the 𝘍𝘢𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘺 𝘊𝘰𝘥𝘦 governing the property relations of unmarried couples living together.

Article 147 applies to unmarried couples who may legally marry. Property acquired during their cohabitation is presumed jointly owned.

Article 148, on the other hand, applies to couples who are not permitted to marry. Only properties obtained through actual contribution are considered common property.

Since the 𝘍𝘢𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘺 𝘊𝘰𝘥𝘦 only allows marriage between a man and a woman, the SC held that same-sex couples necessarily fall under Article 148.

Here, the SC found that the signed 𝘈𝘤𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸𝘭𝘦𝘥𝘨𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵, where one partner admitted that the other paid about half of the property costs, was a binding admission and sufficient proof of actual contribution. This established co-ownership.

Read the full text of the press release at https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/?p=160462.

Read the full text of the Decision at https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/?p=160431.

Read the Concurring Opinion of Senior Associate Justice Marvic M.V.F. Leonen at https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/?p=160444.

Read the Concurrence of Associate Justice Amy C. Lazaro-Javier at https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/?p=160439.

Copying of this content is subject to the SC PIO’s Credit Attribution Policy: https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/credit-attribution-policy/.

HACT EMERGENCY RESCUE UNIT DADPFH SAYAP TREATMENT FACILITY…
Providing immediate care for emergency cases of HIV AIDS Victims across the Province were our services is much needed….

TO all of our valued clients who became part of our DADPFH HACT FAMILY, a million thanks to you, and may u have that dreams come truee in 2026! Heads UP! ITS ANOTHER BLESSED YEAR!

WAG NA IKAW TAMPO B***k!! PWAMISS! Magmamanok nalang tayo sa Bagong TAON! Tara B***K! wawa man cya TAMPO TAMPO...

DADPFH CD 4 count Machine….