D'Queen

How Australia’s Social Media Rule works

Imigrasi Batam mengakui adanya dugaan keterlibatan oknum petugas internal yang bekerja sama dengan calo dalam praktik pungutan liar terhadap warga negara asing (WNA) di pintu masuk Batam. Seorang oknum berinisial JS telah diberhentikan sementara dan tengah menjalani pemeriksaan internal. Dari pendalaman awal, ditemukan indikasi permintaan uang kepada WNA sebesar 100 dolar Singapura. Dalam praktiknya, terjadi negosiasi dengan calo berinisial AS hingga disepakati 250 dolar Singapura. Dari jumlah tersebut, sekitar 150 dolar Singapura diduga diserahkan kepada oknum petugas, sementara sisanya digunakan untuk kepentingan pribadi. Pihak ketiga berinisial AS kini turut diperiksa dan menjalani sidang kode etik. Sementara sosok calo lain yang diduga terlibat telah dikoordinasikan dengan pihak kepolisian untuk proses hukum lebih lanjut. Imigrasi menegaskan tidak akan mentolerir tindakan tersebut dan proses pendalaman masih berlangsung. Sebagai bagian investigasi, petugas menelusuri data perlintasan penumpang pada 13 Maret 2026 serta memeriksa rekaman CCTV di area pelabuhan. Pihak imigrasi juga mengupayakan pengembalian uang kepada wisatawan yang menjadi korban. Pengawasan di lapangan kini diperketat. Pemeriksaan paspor di ruang khusus dihentikan kecuali untuk indikasi paspor atau visa palsu. Sanksi terhadap pelanggaran mengacu pada PP Nomor 94 Tahun 2021 tentang Disiplin Pegawai Negeri Sipil, dengan kemungkinan hukuman ringan hingga sedang. Hasil investigasi akan diserahkan kepada pimpinan untuk penentuan sanksi lebih lanjut. Reporter: M. Sya'ban Editor: Ari #pungli #imigrasi #Batam #PelayananPublik

Throwback to Santa Claus in Ramadan #london #ramadan #muslim

Edited or real? Viral courtroom video raises questions. A case circulating widely on social media claims that what started as a dating app meetup ended in a lawsuit after a woman allegedly ordered an expensive dinner—lobster, steak, and champagne—before leaving the restaurant just before the bill arrived. According to the viral narrative, the man involved was left with an $800+ bill and later took legal action. The story further claims a judge ruled the situation as “theft of services,” ordering repayment and additional compensation. However, there is currently no verified public record confirming this case as presented online, and the circulating video appears to be edited or taken out of context. Even if this specific video may not be real, situations like this have happened to many people—maybe not at this level, but more often than you’d think. Bottom line: The story has sparked debate around dating expectations and accountability—but its authenticity remains unclear. What do you think—should situations like this be considered fraud, or just a bad date? 👇 #scam #datingscams #Dating

🇸🇬😂 Aiyo… this ang moh influenza ah… really next-level geography champion.

Come Singapore, see NTUC, Sheng Siong, Cold Storage, FairPrice Finest, Don Don Donki, even Japanese supermarket got three floors… then still can confidently declare:
“Got no supermarkets.”

Ah Gong suspect he accidentally downloaded the North Korea travel brochure instead of Google Maps.

Maybe he thought:
• Jewel is missile testing facility,
• Our MRT is underground bunker,
• And everyone skinny because ration book just issued.

Bro, here is Singapore leh.

We got more supermarkets than he got followers on a bad day. Some of our aunties even treat supermarket promo day like F1 race - speed, precision, aggressive overtaking.

But nvm lah, every time an influencer blur-blur open mouth, Singapore gets free publicity. Please continue. CPM going up. 🤭